Print Back to Calendar Return
    6. B.    
Board of Adjustment
Meeting Date: 08/21/2013  
CASE:    V-2013-17
APPLICANT: Daniel H. Root, Agent for Greg Meyer, Owner
ADDRESS: 500 Via De Luna
PROPERTY REFERENCE NO.: 28-2S-26-2150-001-013  
ZONING DISTRICT: LDR-PB, Low-Density Residential Pensacola Beach  
FUTURE LAND USE: MU-PB, Mixed-Use, Pensacola Beach

SUBMISSION DATA:
REQUESTED VARIANCE:

The Applicant is seeking a 10 foot variance to reduce the front setback 10 from 50 feet to 40 feet.

RELEVANT AUTHORITY:

Land Development Code of Escambia County, Florida (Ordinance No. 96-3 as amended), Section:
13.03.01.03

13.03.01. Low Density Residential (LDR-PB).

3. If facing County Road 399 setback shall be 50 feet.

CRITERIA

Land Development Code of Escambia County, Florida (Ordinance No. 96-3 as amended), Section 2.05.02
CRITERION (1)
That there are special circumstances or conditions applicable to the building or land in question that are peculiar to such property that do not apply generally to other land or buildings in the vicinity.

FINDINGS-OF-FACT

Section 2.05.02 of the Land Development Code defines special circumstances or conditions specifically as follows: “Such special conditions shall be limited to unusual physical characteristics inherent in the specific piece of property and not common to properties similarly situated. Such physical characteristics include, but are not limited to, exceptional narrowness, shallowness, shape, topographic conditions, or the presence of sensitive environmental resources, any or all of which will result in peculiar or practical difficulties in the quiet enjoyment and use of the property”.

The parcel in question was platted prior to the 50 foot front setback from Via De Luna. The shallowness of the parcel combined with the 50 foot setback presents serious difficulties for building a home on this platted lot.
CRITERION (2)
That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right and not merely to serve as a convenience to the Applicant.

FINDINGS-OF-FACT

The variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right given the site limitations.
CRITERION (3)
That such a variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets, the danger of fire, imperil the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area or in any other respect impair the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the inhabitants of Escambia County.

FINDINGS-OF-FACT

This variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property or unreasonably increase the congestion in public streets, the danger of fire, imperil the public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the surrounding area, or in any other respect impair the health, safety, comfort, or general welfare of the inhabitants of Escambia County.
CRITERION (4)
The variance will not, in any manner, alter other provisions of this Code or Comprehensive Plan.

FINDINGS-OF-FACT

This variance will not alter other provisions of the Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan.
CRITERION (5)
That the variance is the minimum necessary to make possible the use of the land, building or other improvements as approved by the BOA.

FINDINGS-OF-FACT

The requested varaince is the minimum necessary to allow for construction of a home on this residential lot.

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff finds that the applicant can meet all of the required criteria and recommends approval of the request as submitted.

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FINDINGS:

The Board adopted Staff's findings and approved the variance as requested.
Attachments
Working Case File

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved