Print Back to Calendar Return
    6. A.    
Planning Board-Rezoning
Meeting Date: 07/01/2013  
CASE :    Z-2013-13
APPLICANT: Bobby Gene and Sally Lynn Reynolds, Owners
ADDRESS: 12511 Lillian Hwy.
PROPERTY REF. NO.: 02-2S-32-6000-005-002
FUTURE LAND USE: MU-S, Mixed-Use Suburban  
DISTRICT: 1  
OVERLAY DISTRICT: N/A
BCC MEETING DATE: 08/08/2013

SUBMISSION DATA:
REQUESTED REZONING:

FROM: R-4, Multiple-Family District, (cumulative) Medium High Density (18 du/acre)

TO: C-1, Retail Commercial District (cumulative)(25 du/acre)

RELEVANT AUTHORITY:


(1) Escambia County Comprehensive Plan
(2) Escambia County Land Development Code
(3) Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)
(4) Resolution 96-34 (Quasi-judicial Proceedings)
(5) Resolution 96-13 (Ex-parte Communications)
CRITERION (1)
Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.

Comprehensive Plan Policy (CPP) FLU 1.1.1 Development Consistency. New development and redevelopment in unincorporated Escambia County shall be consistent with the Escambia County Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map (FLUM).

CPP FLU 1.1.9 Buffering. In the LDC, Escambia County shall ensure the compatibility of adjacent land uses by requiring buffers designed to protect lower intensity uses from more intensive uses, such as residential from commercial. Buffers shall also be used to protect agricultural activities from the disruptive impacts of nonagricultural land uses and protect nonagricultural uses from normal agricultural activities.

CPP FLU 1.3.1 Future Land Use Categories. The Mixed-Use Suburban (MU-S) Future Land Use (FLU) category is intended for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses while promoting compatible infill development and the separation of urban and suburban land uses. Range of allowable uses include: Residential, Retail and Services, Professional Office, Recreational Facilities, Public and Civic. The minimum residential density is two dwelling units per acre and the maximum residential density is ten dwelling units per acre.

CPP FLU 1.5.3 New Development and Redevelopment in Built Areas. To promote the efficient use of existing public roads, utilities and service infrastructure, the County will encourage redevelopment in underutilized properties to maximize development densities and intensities located in the Mixed Use-Suburban, Mixed Use-Urban, Commercial and Industrial Future Land Use districts categories (with the exception of residential development).

FINDINGS

The proposed amendment to C-1 is consistent with the intent and purpose of Future Land Use category MU-S as stated in CPP FLU 1.3.1. This FLU category allows for a mix of residential and non-residential uses such as retail services and professional offices while promoting infill development. The proposed amendment will utilize the existing roads and infrastructure as stated in CPP FLU 1.5.3.
CRITERION (2)
Consistent with The Land Development Code.
Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any portion of this Code, and is consistent with the stated purpose and intent of this Code.

6.05.11. R-4 multiple-family district, (cumulative) medium high density.
A. Intent and purpose of district. This district is intended to provide for the development of medium high density residential uses and structures. This land use is designed to encourage the efficient use of land and maintain a buffer between lower density residential and business, commercial and industrial districts. The maximum density is 18 dwelling units per acre. Refer to article 11 for uses, heights and densities allowed in R-4, multiple-family areas located in the Airport/Airfield Environs. Refer to the overlay districts within section 6.07.00 for additional regulations imposed on individual parcels with R-3 zoning located in the RA-1(OL) Barrancas Redevelopment Area Overlay District.

6.05.14. C-1 retail commercial district (cumulative).
A. Intent and purpose of district. This district is composed of lands and structures used primarily to provide for the retailing of commodities and the furnishing of selected services. The district provides for various commercial operations where all such operations are within the confines of the building and do not produce undesirable effects on nearby property. New residential uses located in a commercial FLU category are only permitted as part of a predominantly commercial development in accordance with Policy 7.A.4.7.g of the Comprehensive Plan. The maximum density for residential uses is 25 dwelling units per acre, except in the Low Density Residential (LDR) future land use category where the maximum density is 18 dwelling units per acre. Refer to article 11 for uses, heights and densities allowed in C-1, retail commercial areas located in the Airport/Airfield Environs. Refer to the overlay districts within section 6.07.00 for additional regulations imposed on individual parcels with C-1 zoning located in the C-3(OL) Warrington Commercial Overlay District, Scenic Highway Overlay District, C-4(OL) Brownsville-Mobile Highway and "T" Street Commercial Overlay District, or RA-1(OL) Barrancas Redevelopment Area Overlay District.

All retail commercial (C-1) development, redevelopment, or expansion must be consistent with the locational criteria in article 7.

FINDINGS

The proposed amendment is not consistent with the intent and purpose of the Land Development Code as stated in LDC 6.05.14. The proposed zoning change would result in spot zoning as defined in LDC Article 3.02.00.

Spot zoning. Rezoning of a lot or parcel of land that will create an isolated zoning district that may be incompatible with the adjacent and nearby zoning districts and uses, or as spot zoning is otherwise defined by Florida law.

The parcel is located along an arterial roadway within one-quarter mile of a collector/arterial intersection and does meet locational criteria.
CRITERION (3)
Compatible with surrounding uses.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is compatible with existing and proposed uses in the area of the subject property(s).

FINDINGS

The proposed amendment is not compatible with surrounding existing uses in the area.
Within the 500’ radius impact area, staff observed properties with zoning districts R-2 and R-4. In the area staff noted  24 single family residences, 9 vacant parcels, 1 vacant office and 3 mobile homes. The multiple commercial uses and intensities allowed by the proposed C-1 zoning are not compatible with the surrounding residential zonings or uses.
CRITERION (4)
Changed conditions.
Whether and the extent to which there are any changed conditions that impact the amendment or property(s).

FINDINGS

Staff found no changed conditions that would impact the amendment or property.
CRITERION (5)
Effect on natural environment.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment.

FINDINGS
According to the National Wetland Inventory, wetlands and hydric soils were not indicated on the subject property. When applicable, further review during the Site Plan Review process will be necessary to determine if there would be any significant adverse impact on the natural environment.

CRITERION (6)

Development patterns.
Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in a logical and orderly development pattern.

FINDINGS
The proposed amendment would not result in a logical and orderly development pattern. The proposed rezoning from R-4 to C-1 will constitute an isolated zoning district that would be incompatible with the adjacent and nearby zoning districts and uses.

Attachments
Z-2013-13

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved