|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
Call To Order - March 2, 2015 meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. by Vice-Chair Alan McMillan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
Proof of Publication - The meeting was advertised in the Pensacola News Journal on February 21, 2015 and February 28, 2015. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
Attendance - Quorum Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
Approval of Minutes - Approval of the February 2, 2015 RESTORE Advisory Committee Meeting and the February 18, 2015 Minutes of the RESTORE Advisory Committee Workshop
Motion was made by Al Coby to approve the February 2, 2015 Minutes of the RESTORE Advisory Committee Meeting and the February 18, 2015 Minutes of the RESTORE Advisory Committee Workshop. Donnie McMahon seconded. Motion carried unanimously. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
Old Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
|
|
Dewberry Presents Draft Weighing of Selection Criteria
Mike Hanson, Co-Project Manager, Dewberry, presented the two options for weighing the draft Project Selection Criteria:
- Option 1 - Created a point system in which Environmental, Economic and Infrastructure projects had an equal total amount of points while Baseline and Bonus were less.
- Option 2 - Designed a point system that relied on the public survey to weigh each category. Environment having the highest amount of points, then Infrastructure, Economic, Baseline, and then Bonus criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. |
|
|
Discussion on Draft Weighing of Selection Criteria
The Committee was also presented with a third option for weighing the selection criteria provided by RESTORE Escambia. There was much concern with Dewberry being the sole entity to be the assigning these scores from the Committee. Dewberry reassured the Committee that they would be using these numbers as technical scores only to see how feasible a project is. The Committee would be able to review all projects and rank them how they see fit. The Committee requested more time to review these options before discussing which option they preferred. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
|
New Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a. |
|
|
Dewberry Presents RESTORE Project Selection Process
Mr. Hanson presented the RESTORE Project Selection Process to the Committee. The goal of this general timeline was to give the Committee an overview of the RESTORE process. The timeline shows the course in which projects must travel through in order to ascend from the Public to Treasury and how Dewberry is a resource along the way. Additionally, it points out the separation between project submittals and project awards.
Vice-Chair Alan McMillan asked the question as to how the Committee would proceed once the first Multi-Year Implementation Plan was submitted. This question was unresolved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment (limit 3 minutes each)
Jim Cox, 423 Williamsburg Drive, Gulf Breeze
Gary Sansing, 1517 Jackson Street, Pensacola
Tony McCray Jr., 1402 E. Leonard Street, Pensacola
Jessica Koelsch, National Wildlife Federation
Bill Young, 1812 East Desoto Street, Pensacola
Barbara Albrecht, 1203 North 16th Avenue, Pensacola
Sherri Myers, 526 Parker Drive, Pensacola
Beverly Perry, 622 West Belmone Street, Pensacola |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
|
Adjournment - Meeting adjourned at 6:00 pm.
Agendas, minutes and pre-recordings of RESTORE Act Advisory Committee meetings may be viewed at http://www.MyEscambia.com/RESTORE/meetings. To view supporting documents from the RESTORE Act Advisory Committee meeting on March 2, 2015 and previous meetings, visit: http://MyEscambia.com/RESTORE/docs.
|