Print Back to Calendar Return
    7. A.    
Planning Board-Rezoning
Meeting Date: 01/09/2018  
CASE :    Z-2017-17
APPLICANT: Wanda French-Hawkins, Agent for Jason Hawkins, Owner
ADDRESS: 6355 Mockingbird Lane
PROPERTY REF. NO.: 35-1S-30-7117-000-000
FUTURE LAND USE: MU-S, Mixed-Use Suburban  
DISTRICT: 3  
OVERLAY DISTRICT: Oakfield
BCC MEETING DATE: 02/01/2018

SUBMISSION DATA:
REQUESTED REZONING:

FROM: MDR, Medium Density Residential district (10 du/acre)

TO: HDMU, High Density Mixed-use district (25 du/acre)

RELEVANT AUTHORITY:


(1) Escambia County Comprehensive Plan
(2) Escambia County Land Development Code
(3) Board of County Commissioners of Brevard County v. Snyder, 627 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 1993)
(4) Resolution 96-34 (Quasi-judicial Proceedings)
(5) Resolution 96-13 (Ex-parte Communications)

APPROVAL CONDITIONS
Criterion a., LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan
Whether the proposed rezoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and not in conflict with any of the plan provisions.

CPP FLU 1.3.1 Future Land Use Categories. The Mixed-Use Suburban (MU-S) Future Land Use (FLU) category is intended for a mix of residential and non-residential uses while promoting compatible infill development and the separation of urban and suburban land uses. Range of Allowable Uses: residential, retail sales & services, professional office, recreational facilities, public and civic, limited agriculture. The maximum residential density is 25 dwelling units per acre.

FINDINGS
The proposed amendment to HDMU is consistent with the intent and purpose of Future Land Use category MU-S as stated in CPP FLU 1.3.1 The Comprehensive Plan allows for residential, retail sales & services, professional office, recreational facilities, public and civic,limited agriculture.
Criterion b., LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Consistent with The Land Development Code
Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any portion of this Code, and is consistent with the stated purpose and intent of this Code.

Sec. 3-2.7 Medium Density Residential district (MDR).
(a) Purpose. The Medium Density Residential (MDR) district establishes appropriate areas and land use regulations for residential uses at medium densities within suburban or urban areas. The primary intent of the district is to provide for residential neighborhood development in an efficient urban pattern of well-connected streets and at greater dwelling unit density than the Low Density Residential district. Residential uses within the MDR district are limited to single-family and two-family dwellings. The district allows non-residential uses that are compatible with suburban and urban residential neighborhoods.
 
Sec. 3-2.9    High Density Mixed-use district (HDMU).
(a) Purpose. The High Density Mixed-use (HDMU) district establishes appropriate areas and land use  regulations for a complimentary mix of high density residential uses and compatible non-residential uses within urban areas. The primary intent of the district is to provide for a mix of neighborhood retail sales, services and professional offices with greater dwelling unit density and diversity  than the Low Density Mixed-use district.  Additionally, the HDMU district is intended to rely on urban street connectivity and encourage vertical mixes of commercial and residential uses within the same building to accommodate a physical pattern of development characteristic of village main streets and older neighborhood commercial areas. Residential uses within the district include all forms of single-family, two-family and multi-family dwellings.

(b) Permitted uses. Permitted uses within the HDMU district are limited to the following:

(1) Residential. The following residential uses are allowed throughout the district, but if within a Commercial (C) future land use category they are permitted only if part of a predominantly commercial development.
a. Group living, excluding dormitories, fraternity and sorority houses, and residential facilities providing substance abuse treatment, post-incarceration reentry, or similar services.
b. Manufactured (mobile) homes, including manufactured home subdivisions, but excluding new or expanded manufactured home parks.
c. Single-family dwellings (other than manufactured homes), detached or attached, including townhouses and zero lot line subdivisions.
d. Two-family and multi-family dwellings.
See also conditional uses in this district.

(2) Retail sales. Small-scale (gross floor area 6000 sq.ft. or less per lot) retail sales, including Low-THC marijuana dispensing facilities, sales of beer and wine, but excluding sales of liquor, automotive fuels, or motor vehicles, and excluding permanent outdoor storage, display, or sales. See also conditional uses in this district.

(3) Retail services. The following small-scale (gross floor area 6000 sq.ft. or less per lot) retail services, excluding outdoor work or permanent outdoor storage:
a. Bed and breakfast inns.
b. Boarding and rooming houses.
c. Child care facilities.
d. Personal services, including those of beauty shops, health clubs, pet groomers, dry cleaners, and tattoo parlors.
e. Professional services, including those of realtors, bankers, accountants, engineers, architects, dentists, physicians, and attorneys.
f. Repair services, including appliance repair, furniture refinishing and upholstery, watch and jewelry repair, small engine and motor services, but excluding major motor vehicle or boat service or repair.
g. Restaurants, and brewpubs, including on-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages, but excluding drive-in or drive-through service and brewpubs with distribution of alcoholic beverages for off-site sales.
See also conditional uses in this district.

(4) Public and civic.
a. Preschools and kindergartens.
b. Emergency service facilities, including law enforcement, fire fighting, and medical assistance.
c. Foster care facilities.?
d. Places of worship.
e. Public utility structures, excluding telecommunications towers.
See also conditional uses in this district.

(5) Recreation and entertainment.
a. Marinas, private only.
b. Parks without permanent restrooms or outdoor event lighting.
See also conditional uses in this district.

(6) Industrial and related.
No industrial or related uses.

(7) Agricultural and related. Agricultural production limited to food primarily for personal consumption by the producer, but no farm animals.

(8) Other uses. [Reserved]

(e) Location criteria. All new non-residential uses proposed within the HDMU district that are not part of a predominantly residential development or a planned unit development, or are not identified as exempt by district regulations, shall be on parcels that satisfy at least one of the following location criteria:
(1) Proximity to intersection. Along an arterial or collector street and within 200 feet of an intersection with another arterial or collector.
(2) Proximity to traffic generator. Along an arterial or collector street and within a one-quarter mile radius of an individual traffic generator of more than 600 daily trips, such as an apartment complex, military base, college campus, hospital, shopping mall or similar generator.
(3) Infill development. Along an arterial or collector street, in an area where already established non-residential uses are otherwise consistent with the HDMU district, and where the new use would constitute infill development of similar intensity as the conforming development on surrounding parcels. Additionally, the location would promote compact development and not contribute to or promote strip commercial development.
(4) Site design. Along an arterial street and at the intersection with a local street that serves to connect the arterial street to another arterial, and all of the following site design conditions:
a. Any intrusion into a recorded residential subdivision is limited to a corner lot
b. Access and stormwater management is shared with adjoining uses or properties to the extent practicable.
c. Adverse impacts to any adjoining residential uses are minimized by placing the more intensive elements of the use, such as solid waste dumpsters and truck loading/unloading areas, furthest from the residential uses.
(5) Documented compatibility. A compatibility analysis prepared by the applicant provides competent substantial evidence of unique circumstances regarding the parcel or use that were not anticipated by the alternative criteria, and the proposed use will be able to achieve long-term compatibility with existing and potential uses. Additionally, the following conditions exist:
a. The parcel has not been rezoned by the landowner from the mixed-use, commercial, or industrial zoning assigned by the county.
b. If the parcel is within a county redevelopment district, the use will be consistent with the district’s adopted redevelopment plan, as reviewed and recommended by the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA).

(f) Rezoning to HDMU. High Density Mixed-use zoning may be established only within the Mixed-Use Suburban (MU-S), Mixed-Use Urban (MU-U), or Commercial (C) future land use categories. The district is suitable for areas where the intermixing of uses has been the custom, where future uses are uncertain, and some redevelopment is probable. The district is appropriate to provide transitions between areas zoned or used for medium or high density residential and areas zoned or used for commercial. Rezoning to HDMU is subject to the same location criteria as any new non-residential use proposed within the HDMU district.

FINDINGS
The proposed amendment is not consistent with the intent and purpose of the Land Development Code. From a strict review of the regulations stated above, the site does not meet the following required location criteria as listed: proximity to intersection, proximity to traffic generator, and site design. Additionally, the more intense uses of HDMU, such as apartments to neighborhood retail sales, retail services and professional offices, are not found in the surrounding area of the parcel in question. Please note that any potential uses, including intense residential (ie apartments) appears to be constraining due to the existing site conditions concerning access, lot size, and other regulatory requirements, etc... that will need to be review during the development review process. (see Exhibit A for photos submitted by applicant)
Criterion c., LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Compatible with surrounding uses
Whether all land uses, development activities, and conditions allowed by the proposed zoning are compatible with the surrounding conforming uses, activities and conditions and are able to coexist in relative proximity to them in a stable fashion over time such that no use, activity, or condition negatively impacts another. The appropriateness of the rezoning is not limited to any specific use that may be proposed but is evident for all permitted uses of the requested zoning.

FINDINGS
The proposed amendment is not compatible with surrounding existing uses in the area. However, within the 500' radius impact area, staff observed properties associated with zoning districts MDR and HDMU as indicated on the Zoning Map. From a visit to the site, staff observed three mobile homes, one church, single-family residences, and vacant residential properties as indicated on the Existing Land Use map. The proposed amendment would result in a more intense use of the subject property than the surrounding adjacent properties. Most parcels in the area are single-family residences or vacant. The allowable commercial uses in the HDMU zoning are incompatible with the current surrounding parcels in the immediate area, but the uses found on the adjacent and contiguous parcels are existing residential uses.
Criterion d., LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Changed conditions
Whether the area to which the proposed rezoning would apply has changed, or is changing, to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage new uses, density, or intensity in the area through rezoning.

FINDINGS
Staff found no changed conditions that would impact the amendment or property.
Criterion e., LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Development patterns
Whether the proposed rezoning would contribute to or result in a logical and orderly development pattern.

FINDINGS
The proposed amendment would not result in a logical and orderly development pattern. The subject property has HDMU zoning to the southeast, yet only residential uses with the exception of a church are on these parcels. The subject property is surrounded by MDR zoned properties. The current development pattern found in the area is residential.

Criterion (f)   LDC Sec. 2-7.2(b)(4)
Effect on natural environment 
Whether the proposed rezoning would increase the probability of any significant adverse impacts on the natural environment.

FINDINGS
According to the National Wetland Inventory, wetlands and hydric soils were not indicated on the subject property. When applicable, further review during the Site Plan Review process will be necessary to determine if there would be any significant adverse impact on the natural environment.

Attachments
Working Case File

AgendaQuick©2005 - 2024 Destiny Software Inc., All Rights Reserved